Monday, December 30, 2019

The, Nearest Neighbors, By Sherry Turkle - 886 Words

Ever since the invention of the computer, humans have always wanted to create an artificial intelligence that can act and feel the way a human does. In Alone Together by Sherry Turkle, she explains that through games and artificial intelligence, humans have been changing the way that both children and adults think and feel, thus bridging the gap between emotional machines (humans) and intelligent machines (computers). Turkle is able to show how her experiences through working at MIT in the 70’s to how children perceive things as alive enough in the form of a video game, as a way of explaining that gap between man and machine has been getting closer and closer. The first chapter offers a strong viewing of how humans have been trying to close the gap of emotional and intelligent machines since the 1970’s. In the first section of the first chapter, â€Å"Nearest Neighbors†, Turkle explains how Weizenbaum’s program ELIZA, which was being analyzed at MIT, was b eing used to show how words can be strung together. The students were inputting dialogue to the program, and it was responding. If the user would say something about their mother, the program would respond with a response that a human may offer. â€Å"ELIZA had no model of what a mother might be or any way to represent the feeling of anger. What it could do was take strings of words and turn them into questions or restate them as interpretations† (31). This model of thought would go on to be used throughout the attempts of

Sunday, December 22, 2019

Justice Is Not Only A Good Thing - 2112 Words

In The Republic, the topic of justice dominates the conversation in Books 1 and 2. Socrates, Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus explore the definition of justice in the individual and state through a series of debates and discussions, with each of them arguing which is most advantageous, justice or injustice. For the majority of Books I and II Socrates defends his claim that justice is not only a good thing in and of itself, but also favorable for the state and individual for its consequences. Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus offer counterclaims to Socrates’ argument in order to elicit elaboration on the role of justice and its importance. While looking at each interlocutor’s arguments, one can see that they all are convincing, but with further analysis, each it flawed in proving whether justice or injustice is the most favorable. Based on the arguments proposed, I believe the views of injustice given by Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus benefit the individu al in attaining short-term, extrinsic benefits. However, Socrates’ view of justice, that justice is in fact more favorable and advantageous than injustice, benefits the individual in gaining long-term and intrinsic, more complex benefits. Thrasymachus argues that perfect injustice is more profitable than perfect justice, even going as far as saying â€Å"on a sufficient scale, justice is mightier, freerer, and more masterful than justice (344c).† In short, perfect injustice, especially on a large scale, will allowShow MoreRelatedPlatos Republic1243 Words   |  5 Pagesthe beautiful itself are followers of the sight of truth, the philosophers. Knowledge is based on what is, or truths. The only established truths are the forms. The forms represent true, eternal, unchanging, or facts. Knowledge stems from the idea of forms. One who has knowledge must understand the forms. Only a philosopher has this understanding, and therefore only a philosopher has knowledge. Contrary to knowledge, ignorance is based on what is not, or untruths. Opinion represents allRead MoreJustice Is Necessary For Society1327 Words   |  6 PagesFrom an early age, we are all taught to be good. More accurately, what we learn is justice, the defining difference between right and wrong. We grow to understand that justice is not just an idea or something we should do, but something that everyone in the world understands and subscribes to. However, at some point in our lives we often waver in how just we are, questioning if being just is really so important. In Book two of The Republic, Plato’s account of the conversation between Socrates andRead MoreIs Ross A Pluralistic View On Inherently Good Things And The Values Of Human Beings1284 Words   |  6 Pagespluralistic view on intrinsically good things compared to hedonists that have a monistic view on intrinsically good things (Skelton, 2010). Ross argues that there is not only one intrinsically good thing, but that there in fact are four intrinsically good things: virtue, pleasure, justice, and knowledge. There should be more than one intrinsically good thing because there can be exceptions to pleasure as the only intrinsically good thing, which is also why a prima facie good thing is an important aspect toRead MoreThe Republic By Plato982 Words   |  4 Pagesto the account of nature and origin of justice. Socrates and Glaucon discuss the theory presented by Glaucon that states that injustice is something that is intrinsically desired by all humans. Glaucon presents this argument to Socrates in order to understand and defend justice for its own sake. Glaucon seeks reassurance from Socrates that justice is not just only good for the positive consequences that it produces, so he asks Socrates to explain that justice is desirable for its own sake and, additionallyRead MoreThe Virtue Of Justice By Thomas Aquinas1489 Words   |  6 Pageslegal realm by connecting the ideas of virtue and justice in a resourceful way. This paper discusses the virtue of justice in general, according to St. Thomas Aquinas’ doctrine drawing mainly on the Summa Theologiae. To efficiently understand what the virtue of justice is, the first thing this paper will seek to explain is the core of virtue in general. Having defined virtue, it will proceed to explore the virtue of justice since a true justice commitment aligns itself with the necessary prerequisitesRead MoreThe Republic, By Plato1172 Words   |  5 Pageswhat â€Å"justice† really means. Socrates truly examines what he thinks the true value behind the word actually is. However, he isn’t alone other characters such as Cephalus, Thrasymachus, and Polemarchus all have something to contribute to the conversation. Socrates is the man who checks the truth behind each one, while Plato shares his thoughts on what Socrates believes is true. Truth in all the arguments and what each person brings to the table help t hem figure out what justice means. Justice in theRead MoreThe Ethical Egoist: Whats the Problem in Plato’s The Republic, Socrates824 Words   |  3 PagesIn Plato’s The Republic, Socrates tries to explain the value of justice to man. Other educated Athenians challenge him, however Socrates pokes holes in all of their statements. Socrates argues that there are many problems with their views on social philosophy, especially when it comes to Thrasymachus’ idea of ethical egoism. Plato delivers his view of justice through Socrates when he responds to Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Cephalus on the issue. Throughout the discussion, Plato never argues againstRead More Model of Justice in Platos The Republic Essay1705 Words   |  7 PagesModel of Justice in Platos The Republic In what is perhaps his most well-known text, The Republic, Plato explores the fundamental concept of justice, how it is observed in the world, and its application to the lives of men. When he identifies the good in Book VI, which is reality and knowledge in their true forms, Plato also describes the visual world of shadows and false reality that people perceive and is cast by the sun. What follows from these definitions is that, while justiceRead MoreSocrates s Theory Of Justice1202 Words   |  5 Pageslike an answer regarding this type of justice, and if it is good only for its results or good in itself. Socrates argues that justice in the individual is the balance between sprit, reason, and desire (scc. 435a). Socrates’ account of justice, displays a life in which a justice provides benefits not only for the individual, but also society. In this case, Socrates account of justice, does not provide a sufficient reason to be just. Socrates parallel of justice an d health cannot answer Glaucon’s requestRead MoreThe Importance Of Justice In Platos Crito883 Words   |  4 Pagesreflects the development of justice that is first revealed in Plato’s Crito. In Crito, it is evident that justice was carried out in a different manner than in The Consolation of Philosophy as well as each individual’s experience. Boethius was a man who cherished material goods and lacked connection with whom to pray to, God, and defined justice through his own opinion. Socrates possessed the immaterial good of dedication to act in a morally correct manner and reach justice through abiding by the laws

Friday, December 13, 2019

Creative Thinking Week 4 Free Essays

How might you use the strategies for applying creativity to problems and issues in addressing this topic? I would use the novel approach with a few things, first I would use it to encourage readers to research each candidate, get all the facts available and second I would be sure to have both good and bad facts as part of the article its self not as part of the end of the article, however I do like the links to other articles that pertain to that issue. I would also try to improve what the writer of the article said; I think I would have added more about this year’s campaign slogan and what the president has on his to do list. I might even ask for reader comments, or their answer to a particular question. We will write a custom essay sample on Creative Thinking Week 4 or any similar topic only for you Order Now This would incorporate the reader’s views and help me to appeal to them more. I would also try to redefine the first campaign to show how while not everything that was promised has been done, progress has been made, and we are still moving forward but we have to give things time, none of this happened over night and it is not going to be fixed overnight either. Most importantly I want to be sure that I present facts but in a way that sounds like I am actually saying it, I want to give it my own twist of creativity. How might you use the strategies for promoting curiosity in addressing this topic? Why do you think these strategies might be effective? By using the strategies for promoting curiosity in addressing this topic you are going deeper into your work and getting the whole picture. Curiosity is having the desire to learn, that means you ask questions, research, do everything in your power to know more about whatever it is you are curious in. I think these strategies might be effective because it allows you to go deeper and see what is lying beneath it all. You will be able to find out information that you wouldn’t be able to know from the first glance. Being curious makes you gain more knowledge, in this situation you would be able to provide the best information on the topic and provide all the right answers for both sides to your readers. How might you use the various methods for producing ideas to eliminate the bias from the original article and still present a factual and persuasive case? To make my topics and articles more interesting I will use all the strategies. The reason being for using all the strategies is because I want to add more life to the article and get the viewers to fully read through my article. One of the strategies is taking a novel approach, I believe that if I take a novel approach in the article that I wrote then I ill have the readers reading the article as a story so they can get more in depth with the article. Another strategy is devising or modifying a process or system, with this I will make sure that I have a plan so that I will not be free handing through my entire article. I will also use finding new uses for existing things because the stories in the article may involve old stories but adding new stories will brighten the article more. Lastly, inventing or redefining a concept so that my article looks the part and looks new and improved. How to cite Creative Thinking Week 4, Essay examples

Thursday, December 5, 2019

Group Motivation Inventory Paper free essay sample

Group Motivation Inventory Paper Ephraim Iivula PSY430 July 04, 2011 Nicole Darling University of Phoenix Group Motivation Inventory The task of motivating individuals in a group setting requires an understanding of each member’s personality attribute. As such, experts successfully devised theories to help in assessing people’s personality traits. The essence of this evaluation is that many ostensibly discrepancies in a human behavior is orderly and steady because of basic differences in the ways individuals desire to use their perception and judgment.Hence, this paper details my personality letters as manifested under Engleberg and Wynn’s (2010) description of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. The paper further explores the effect of such personality trait, and the motivational aspect in a group setting. What I Learned About Myself in this Exercise The Personality Type Letters that represent my personality description of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator are I,S,T,P. In view of this disclosure, I have learned that my personality is that of an introvert, sensing, thinking, and a perceiving individual. We will write a custom essay sample on Group Motivation Inventory Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This personality is also of someone who is tolerant, flexible, quiet observer until a problem appears and acts quickly to find workable solutions. In addition, this trait of personality provides analysis of what make effects work and readily peruse large amount of data to isolate the core of practical problems. Moreover, the personality finds interest in cause, effect, and organizes facts using logical principles along with value efficiency. How this Knowledge Affect the Way I interact in GroupsThis personality knowledge creates a profound effect on my personal awareness and self-actualization. Nonetheless, my group interaction remains constant, even as Myers-Briggs Type Indicator provides this new insight into my personality traits. This is perhaps because the group interaction is hard to measure and personality trait remains consistent. However, noting an element of perceptiveness in my personality trait, it means I am the opposite of a compulsive talker who often turns defensive as others question his or her group contribution. A defensive climate triggers our instinct to protect ourselves when we are being physically or verbally attacked by someone. Even though such reactions are natural, they hinder productive group interaction† (Engleberg Wynn, 2010, p. 178). Subsequently, the personality awareness provides group members with a rare positive feedback on each individual member’s character and the rationale behind members’ respective actions. What I will do Differently in Future Groups as a Result of this Exercise The obvious fact is that I am in total agreement with the result of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator exercise.The knowledge of different personality types helps in future groups’ interaction, as one turns to value and appreciate differences between people. This exercise will help in dealing with future group mates who would behaves oddly and succeed more in engaging group members offering different affections. The exercise has further consolidated my skills in tackling team assignment contributions more effectively by leveraging my noted personality shortcomings. Noting that my personality encompasses a persona of a quiet observer until a problem appears, setting timeframes, and precaution will feature in my future group goal settings. Therefore, reverting to this exercise will help in designing an aspect of a premeditated approach that further prevent past group experience of procrastinations. What I May Do to be More Motivated The brand of personality that I possess is unique and suitable for working in groups as it incorporates sensing, thinking, and a perceiving. As such, motivation in a group is easily achievable with a healthy amount of thinking that elevates the concept of brainstorming. â€Å"When group members set the group’s goals, the process can create a more interdependent, cooperative, and cohesive environment in which to work.Group goals should be both specific and challenging. Specific goals lead to higher performance than do generalized goals† (Engleberg Wynn, 2010, p. 36). Motivators that Would Help Me to be More Motivated when Working in a Group Knowing that my personality trait contains a level of tolerance and a high degree of flexibility, I think these two aspects should serve as good incentives. Tolerance will ensure that I deal well with other members in the group who will have potentially different mindsets and personalities.In this kind of group setting, too often diverse personalities create advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is a pool of diverse opinions, whereas the disadvantage is always a lack of immediate consensus because of diverse opinions in goal setting. My brand of personality as abovementioned will accommodate others’ opinions through tolerance and flexible approach toward finding a middle ground. Therefore, the personality trait that contains perceiving does more in allowing other group members to weigh in their opinions prior to judgments, which is crucial to group cohesion.Incentives When Group Members’ M otivations are Different According to Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, my personality trait contains a letter ‘P’, which stands for perception. This personality feature will serve as an excellent incentive when group members’ motivations are different. â€Å"Increase in motivation comes about because group-based goal setting produces a better match of member and group needs, a better understanding of the group actions needed to achieve the goal, and a better appreciation of how individual members can contribute to group action† (Engleberg Wynn, 2010, p. 6). Consequently, perception helps with becoming aware of effects, individuals, activities, and thoughts of various members of the group. The aspect of knowing the individual members’ characteristics should help in group cohesion, realistic goal setting, and conflict resolutions. Conclusion The concept of group motivation and individual personality analysis finds resonance in the success of group goal attainment. The success of any group requires an ethos that binds diverse personality traits toward a common goal setting, motivation, and group cohesion. My personality contains a mixture of four dichotomies relevant to the success of the notion of working in groups. If properly leveraged, this sort of personality can serve the purpose of critical thinking, sensible decision-making, and realistic goal setting. Understanding the description of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is an excellent method for students working in groups or aiming for group leadership to adjust their weaknesses and capitalize on their personality strengths.As Engleberg and Wynn, (2010) observed, without leadership, a group may be nothing more than a collection of individuals, lacking the coordination, and motivation to achieve a common goal. Personally, the description and the knowledge of my personality serve as a morale boost in contributing to the group interaction and tasks accomplishment. As earlier observed, knowing my personality traits also helps in strengthening the optimal urge of playing a leading role, which in turn is a necessity for attaining leade rship. Reference Engleberg, I. N. , Wynn, D. R. (2010). Working in groups. (5th ed. ). Boston: Pearson/Allyn Bacon